|
http://curezone.com/forums/troll.asp ↓
|
|
| Name: luckey_in_life | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 9:34 PM |
| Does this mean you posted it under the name of SAHM? Or, did you do a google and find SAHM's source? ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 9:35 PM |
| No, just my sharp eye lol. There were words like CureZone and others in the post that bring specific Google results. ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 9:35 PM |
| I knew this was not her post! I asked twice and got no response! I hate to say it E, but do you think it could be Maxi? I haven't seen her around and she is the peacemaker on here. That was my thought. With no disrespect of course, I love Maxi! ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 9:36 PM |
| You beat me to it E, I was going to go look it up and check myself! ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 9:40 PM |
Julia, have you seen Maxie's "language"??? It's sooo unique, with her laugh in there. She was never didactic likke that SAHM.
Anyway, Maxie is waaay to wise to stay away from all of this. ↑ |
| Name: Layne | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 10:46 PM |
| No way not maxie. Its screaming jeanie ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 10:57 PM |
| Don't you chat with Jeannie E? Can't you email her and just ask? The troll message was not her words though? How can you tell from the little bit she has written in response to everyone? You know her better than I do, so I will take your word for it. ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:00 PM |
Julia, go to this text and compare them. The original text was purely about Internet disruptors - like Bitchy. Jeanie added some more - about Sahms, tweaked examples that correspond to this forum.
I do not email with her lately. What is interesting to me is that Jeanie herself has never surfaced, though her name has been used over the last two days. Hmmmmmmmmmm ↑ |
| Name: Layne | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:01 PM |
| ok Im the dumb one. How do you know that. ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:02 PM |
| I do think it's her time-released anger. ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:02 PM |
| Name: Layne | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:03 PM |
| her name has been used. what do you mean? ↑ |
| Name: Layne | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:04 PM |
| time released. (snicker) ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:05 PM |
| oh, I mean we've been discussing that it was Jeanie who was SAHM on here. Jeanie herself, I know, reads this forum. How come she never got on and said, "It wasn't me"? ↑ |
| Name: Layne | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:09 PM |
ok. Im a little slow. Good point. she Im sure wants the credit. I didnt like the way she responded to you when she came in a few days ago. some brief jab. But you just didnt pay it any mind.
I dont remember the conversation. but you will. ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:11 PM |
| But don't you think whoever did write it would have made a point to type different? She did make the point that she did not want anyone knowing who she was in fear of the response. I would have been discreet in my typing, wouldn't you?? ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:12 PM |
| I know what you mean. The hostility was building up there. ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:14 PM |
| Julia, one thig is to make a post that you have time to make. Another thing is to react in real life. You have to have some brains to do both - to react and care about typing. Only Jeanie has the even keel to drive the point down, systematically, no matter who attacks. ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:15 PM |
| Bunny - I don't like your attitude, this is your explanation. I won't talk to you from now on. ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:23 PM |
| Well if jeanie ever comes back, I guess we'll just wait for her response to the accusations. Still think it's probably someone you would never expect. ↑ |
| Name: Julia | Date: Nov 17th, 2006 11:30 PM |
| See ya in a few days ladies. This bickering and cussing is bringing me down. I need a break. Bye for now! ↑ |
| Name: marija | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 12:16 AM |
bye Julia have a nice break...have a ice-cream for me :-)))
I think its Jeanne and i think MVSavant is Charla
Jeanne for all the reasons stated above and Charla because the posts are pointless jabs and she writes in Capitals.
Like i said before i care not who's who as long as they dont deliberately set out to hurt someone, which neither has done and only one has been annoying something all of us can get over. ↑ |
| Name: SAHM | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 2:04 AM |
| marija, other than E's reasons what might be your own reasons? ↑ |
| Name: marija | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 2:36 AM |
well i did say it in the Paulus are you lurking post, but here goes again....
i think you are intelligent, you have an air of maturity about you (doesnt always have to be a fight) you know my writings, you say you were one of the first to leave,( the above statement i attribute to alot of ladies here but as alot of you never left it narrowed down the field) i dont know the others and without wanting to offend anyone i did not post on Rains topics because i did not like the clique that was here at that time...now im not saying that what they had to say was not advice or bad advice i just didnt want to be a part of there mothering styles (felt i couldnt live up to their standards)
it was a choice i made that affected noone.
So that was Rain down, E was a choice because of the writing style but i believe her when she said she wasnt, now she can be lying i have no doubt people lie. But to me she has written posts that are just as contraversial and did so under her real name. The only other person i thought it may be is Wilsavannahsmom and like Rain i dont know her or have spoken to her.
Otherwise what it boiled down to was a feeling. You said that your post was not personal yet i think because you felt compelled to post it under another name that it was personal and it may affect friendships already made.
Like i said above It matters nought who you are, i found you interesting until the ignorant and in need of attention remark and the later tendancy to be a follower post, your credibility slipped in my eyes. Maybe its because im arrogant enough to think i have no faults and am an individual, or because i found the remark childish.
I like to think it was the later but it could possibly be the former.
I will leave that to you to enlighten me...im still puzzled by the remark. Anyway i have rambled long enough. These are the reasons why i think jeanne is you ↑ |
| Name: marija | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 2:55 AM |
| hello are you still here, interested in your reply ↑ |
| Name: SAHM | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 2:56 AM |
| I would not give her credit. You do it to freely. I have read remarks made by everyone and only two have been strong in the opinion. The others seem to be questioning their own feelings. ↑ |
| Name: marija | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 3:06 AM |
| ok now im confused again...strong opinion on what and what do i do freely and who is not getting credit? ↑ |
| Name: SAHM | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 3:11 AM |
| I will not give anyone credit for the writings that have been layed out here. I think your strong opinions of who it is I am. I am not disguised except to say my name is changed. ↑ |
| Name: KKKatie | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 3:21 AM |
| Goodie. Now we have trolls. Trolls! No kidding. ↑ |
| Name: marija | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 10:26 AM |
| SAHM what is a name change if not a disguise? ↑ |
| Name: E | Date: Nov 18th, 2006 12:05 PM |
Jeanie, who else here would know CureZone - a disease-related forum. You are into health.
Jeanie, it's Creepy of you to change your name and enjoy playing people. I kind of suspected this tendency of yours when you would go on and on when you played with "poopdiva" name. I understood it when you posted about your porn past under another name - you found it easier to hide that painful matter behind a mask.
I do not understand your current prolonged play. Marija has presented logical reasons, all you do is evade, change a subject, or answer with a question. Exactly like Jeanie would do - when she was in a "playfool" mood. Only now it's CREEPY. ↑ |
|
|
